The retail giant Walmart faces a significant legal setback after losing a defamation lawsuit. This follows a California jury’s decision ordering the company to pay $34.7 million to Jesús “Jesse” Fonseca, a former employee who worked as a truck driver for 14 years.
Fonseca argued that the company unjustly defamed him, damaging his reputation and personal life. Here, we break down five key points to understand this case, which has sparked controversy in labor and business sectors.
1. Who is Jesús “Jesse” Fonseca, and what was his role at Walmart?
Jesús “Jesse” Fonseca was employed by Walmart for 14 years as a truck driver. According to his lawsuit, Fonseca was an exemplary employee recognized both internally and externally.
ALSO READ: These are the 40 deals from Sam’s Club’s holiday coupon book from November 21 to December 12
The plaintiff was a leader in his department, received multiple awards, and participated in hiring and safety committees, the lawsuit stated. Fonseca even became the face of Walmart truckers in a national television commercial.
In 2017, he suffered a workplace accident when another vehicle rear-ended his truck. As a result, Fonseca was placed on medical leave under workers’ compensation and instructed by his doctors to avoid driving commercial vehicles for extended periods.
2. Why did Walmart fire Fonseca?
The conflict arose when Fonseca, while on medical leave, informed Walmart about his plans for a family trip in a recreational vehicle (RV) and, later, a cruise with his wife.
Although Fonseca claims he was transparent about his activities, the Walmart workers’ compensation management hired external investigators to monitor his movements.
Fonseca was recorded driving the RV and engaging in activities like bending, which were restricted by his doctors.
Despite explaining that the medical restrictions applied only to his work environment, Walmart concluded that he acted with “intentional dishonesty” and fired him for violations of its code of ethics.
3. Walmart Defamation Lawsuit: What did the jury decide in this case?
Fonseca sued Walmart in 2019, alleging defamation among other charges. During the trial, the jury heard testimony confirming that Walmart failed to properly investigate the circumstances or consider Fonseca’s explanations before making its decision.
Ultimately, a San Bernardino County jury ruled in Fonseca’s favor, awarding him $9.7 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages. According to Fonseca’s lead attorney, David deRubertis, the case reflects a “malicious” Walmart policy against injured workers.
4. What was Walmart’s response to the verdict in the Defamation Lawsuit?
Walmart, in an official statement, called the verdict “outrageous” and stated that it would seek all available legal remedies to overturn the decision. “This outrageous verdict simply does not reflect the straightforward and uncontested facts of this case (…) Accordingly, we will pursue all available remedies,” the company said in a statement.
However, Fonseca’s attorneys argued that the case sets an important precedent for protecting the rights of injured workers facing unfair retaliation.
ALSO READ: Walmart Oven Death Case UPDATES: What happened to the Halifax investigation?
5. What does this case mean for labor rights and Walmart’s reputation?
The case has brought Walmart’s labor policies and treatment of injured employees into the spotlight. According to Fonseca’s lawyers, Walmart’s corporate ethics appear to prioritize protecting its interests over fairness and justice for its workers.
“We hope that this brave jury’s message reaches Bentonville and that Walmart changes this malicious policy of defaming injured workers like Jesse, who did nothing wrong,” deRubertis stated.
The reputational and financial impact of this ruling could influence how Walmart and other large corporations manage labor relations in the future. For now, Fonseca celebrates a victory that, for him, is more moral than financial.
With information from Courthouse News
